Wednesday, March 05, 2014

 

Priceless Treasures



“What does not cost anything is not worth anything!” This mantra, or something to that effect, exists in most languages. And at face value, there is a lot to be said for it: valuable things are not free. But think about it: encouraging words, random acts of kindness, a hug or a kiss- what do they cost? Nothing. In fact, the most valuable things in life cost nothing, because you can’t put a price tag on them. Yet our age is obsessed with determining the price of everything, and in the process hit all kinds of paradoxes: how much is a human life worth, so they can quantify insurance premiums? How much is palliative care allowed to cost?

A few years back, a Swiss economist conducted an experiment: he looked at people who regularly donated blood, and then randomly selected some to whom he offered money for doing so. The result was that those rewarded financially were less likely to give blood. This counter-intuitive reaction has become known as the “Crowding Out” effect, when intrinsic motivation is crowed out by the introduction of money. And even in daily life can we observe that phenomenon: when everything is remunerated, be it the taking out of trash with gold stars or the participating in the political process with tax favours, the little idealism or volunteering instinct gets eroded by greed.

I happen to currently live in a country which, for all its flaws, is very good at civic engagement. When I staying with my 78 year old uncle in 2001 and 9/11 happened, he immediately picked up the phone and asked the hospital whether they needed blood: I cannot imagine an Austrian coming up with that reaction. Most museums, and there are many of them right in the United States, are supported by donations: rich philanthropists, but also middle-class Frank and Sally who have a standing order for $15/month because “that is what we do”. Idealism, philanthropy, civic engagement- what beautiful values, none of which can be quantified with money. Yet increasingly non-profit organizations are also evaluated by the “philanthropic return on investment”, by how much benefit the donors’ contributions yielded, and that is quantified monetarily.

In other words we seem to be caught in the dilemma of most things in life costing money, yet money being a poor measure for the value of things. Nowhere is this more evident as when you evaluate somebody’s life achievement. Some papers have begun to coin the phrase of somebody’s “net-worth”: Bill Gates- 76 billion, Tom Monoghan 500 million, Opra- 2.9 billion. This is a scary concept. The beggar down the street, or monks like myself who don’t own personal property, would thus have a net worth of zero, or even a negative one. Really? Surely we need a different standard to attribute worth.

Today marks the beginning of Lent in the West. This season, like Ramadan for Muslims, is meant to be a season of preparation, purification and prayer. Fasting, one of its aspects, is supposed to provide a “spiritual detox”, getting rid of all the mental, emotional and spiritual waste we have accumulated. Maybe this would be a good time to ponder priceless things in our lives: time with friends, acts of kindness, prayer and recollection. Are we investing enough in those treasures, or are we possessed by increasing our net worth? Are we defining our life by how much we make or own, or by how much we contribute? As Winston Churchill used to say: “We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give.”



Comments:
Very inspiring Tino! Have a blessed Lent
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?